Five CSK games only hardcore fans will remember

From throwing a surprise in the batting order to smashing sixes after sixes, CSK have done it all

Deivarayan Muthu31-Mar-2020If you’re a Chennai Super Kings supporter, you’ll remember MS Dhoni’s sensational 29-ball 54 not out against Kings XI Punjab in Dharamsala in 2010 and that rare, pumped-up celebration where he jabbed himself in the jaw like a boxer. That was probably the moment when Dhoni became Chennai’s . Here are five less-known contests that only hardcore Super Kings fans will recall.Spin barrage at Kingsmead
v Kings XI Punjab, 2009

Kingsmead isn’t Chepauk, but Super Kings’ spinners rallied to make their team’s 116 for 9 in this game the lowest total successfully defended in the history of the IPL. Kings XI’s line-up was packed with left-handers, so Super Kings looked to counter them by yanking rookie R Ashwin off the bench and uniting him with the vastly experienced Muttiah Muralitharan and part-timer Suresh Raina.Muralitharan let rip biting offbreaks and , and at the other end Ashwin relentlessly attacked the stumps and took the prized wicket of Kumar Sangakkara. From a reasonably well-placed 32 for 1, Kings XI collapsed to 92 for 8 at the end of the 20th over, with the three offspinners returning combined figures of 12-0-38-6.Yellow Magic Orchestra: his team-mates get their hands on Suresh Raina, who took four wickets and effected a run-out against Victoria in the 2010 Champions League T20•AFPRaina the Ripper
v Victoria, 2010


The Super Over ended in defeat for Super Kings, but it was an achievement that they even got there, given Victoria were, at one point, cruising at 104 for 2 in pursuit of 163. Then Muttiah Muralitharan dismissed Matthew Wade and Andrew McDonald off successive balls in the 12th over. But David Hussey took charge of the tricky chase, and it came down to 24 needed off 18 balls when, from out of nowhere, Suresh Raina prised out two wickets in the 18th over and then another two in the first three balls of the 20th. Victoria eventually needed one run off the last ball. Bryce McGain wildly slogged and missed an offbreak, and a subsequent mix-up saw MS Dhoni chuck the ball to Raina, who completed the run-out. Hussey then sealed the deal in the Super Over, cracking Ashwin for three sixes. Super Kings’ batsmen – Vijay and Raina – ultimately came up well short amid a thin drizzle.When Ashwin was used as opener
v Kolkata Knight Riders, 2013


Super Kings don’t usually tinker with their line-up much, so when they were set a target of 120 by hosts Kolkata Knight Riders in 2013, everyone expected M Vijay to walk out to open alongside Mike Hussey though Vijay was out of form. Instead, Super Kings elevated R Ashwin to the top. While he only scored 11 off 13 balls, the match provided a rare instance of MS Dhoni’s men going against the grain. In the end, Hussey’s steady 40 and Ravindra Jadeja’s rapid 36 – he struck at 257.15 on a surface where nearly everybody else struggled – sealed victory.Close but cigar: Dwayne Bravo nearly went for 19 off the last over against Delhi Daredevils in 2015•BCCIWhen they stopped Morkel in time
v Delhi Daredevils, 2015


Chepauk was used to watching Albie Morkel launch mighty sixes and whistling for him. However, in 2015, he was in Delhi Daredevils colours and gave Super Kings a serious scare with a 55-ball 73 in a chase of 151. Even as wickets kept falling at the other end, Morkel dug deep and took it to 19 needed off the last over, bowled by Dwayne Bravo. Morkel edged the first ball past the keeper for four, and mis-hit the next to long-on for a single. Bravo had Imran Tahir holing out the next ball, but Morkel walloped the fourth over midwicket for six, and followed it with two runs off the fifth. Delhi needed six off the last ball, and Bravo missed his length. Morkel wound up and lofted the ball, but it bounced once before reaching the long-off rope. Delhi were denied by about six feet. MS Dhoni’s cardiac Kings had finished on the right side of yet another thriller.Dhoni fireworks in Ranchi
v Sunrisers Hyderabad, 2013


In his first two high-profile matches in his hometown, Ranchi, one for India and one for Super Kings, MS Dhoni had not done much with the bat. In the third, this Champions League T20 group match, he launched Thisara Perera for five sixes in an over, including one that was reminiscent of the six over long-on that won India the 2011 World Cup. In all, Dhoni shellacked eight sixes and a four during his unbeaten 63 off 19 balls. Suresh Raina dazzled with the bat too on, hitting 84 off 57 balls. Darren Sammy tried to match Super Kings’ big hitting in a chase of 203 with his 50 off 25 balls, but Dwayne Bravo and Mohit Sharma closed out a 12-run win with their variations.

Nicholas Pooran makes the most of run-out reprieve

According to ESPNcricinfo’s Luck Index, Delhi Capitals would have won the game had Rishabh Pant effected the run-out in the eighth over

ESPNcricinfo stats team20-Oct-2020Nicholas Pooran’s 28-ball 53 was the key contribution in Kings XI Punjab’s third successive win, but according to ESPNcricinfo’s Luck Index, the result would have gone the other way had Rishabh Pant effected that run-out off the penultimate ball of the eighth over. Pooran had already been involved in Mayank Agarwal’s run-out earlier in the innings – though that was probably because Agarwal didn’t respond to what was a legitimate call for a single – but here, when Glenn Maxwell refused the call, Pooran was well short of the crease and should have been out.ESPNcricinfo LtdHis dismissal then would have reduced Kings XI to 70 for 4 in the eighth, with not too many batsmen in the hutch. As it turned out, Pant’s flick missed the stumps, the batsmen ran an overthrow, and Pooran then made the most of that reprieve, slamming 42 off his next 19 deliveries. By the time he finally got out, Kings XI had moved along to 125 in the 13th over, and the required run-rate had dropped to less than a run a ball.According to Luck Index, Kings XI would have scored 23 runs fewer had Pooran been out in the eighth over, and Delhi Capitals would have won the match. This calculation is done by an algorithm which distributes those 19 extra balls that Pooran faced, among the batsmen who remained unbeaten, and if necessary, those who didn’t bat in the innings. (This calculation takes into account the expected balls that each batsman is likely to play, based on their quality.) Considering that Kings XI didn’t have much batting firepower after Deepak Hooda and Jimmy Neesham, it is fair to assume that the other batsmen wouldn’t managed these runs. That theory is further reinforced by Kings XI’s skittish approach to the final overs throughout the tournament.Delhi Capitals will be ruing that missed chance, but for the tournament itself, this result is a good one, and keeps more teams in the hunt for the playoffs, and the top two positions.

Steven Smith and Australia turn batting masterclass into Groundhog Day

Their one-day batting seems to be evolving with each game, and could soon leave the rest of the pack behind

Andrew McGlashan29-Nov-20201:40

Gambhir: Smith not that far away from Kohli in ODIs

Steven Smith’s innings at the SCG on Sunday felt like a highlights package and at the same time, it a highlights package.We might as well have been watching his spectacular display two days ago when he scorched a 62-ball hundred (that premise could have applied to most of Australia’s innings). Instead, we were watching it produced all over again: another 62-ball century, which if not for a slip of Marnus Labuschagne’s feet, would have been 61 deliveries.On both these occasions he could not have wished for a better situation: the ideal foundation provided by David Warner and Aaron Finch, a flat pitch and a bowling attack struggling for any consistency and control. However, even though Smith’s batting feats have been mind-boggling in the past, it has been a particularly notable 72 hours for him.Were we watching another evolution of Smith the batsman? This isn’t to say he was doing things that he hasn’t done before – he has a T20 century off 54 balls and has dissected many a bowling attack in the one-day format – but the sustained nature of the onslaughts felt different.What the one-day game gives Smith is that one thing he loves: time at the crease. While Test cricket offers him his ultimate indulgence, the 50-over game allows him to evolve an innings.Another day, another ton for Steven Smith•Getty ImagesHe has not been slow at any point of these centuries, but in the first of them he was 30 off 30 balls and today was 21 at a run-a-ball. Then, the hands have really gotten to work. On Friday, he scored 75 off his remaining 36 balls and on Sunday he cracked 83 off 43 from the same position.As is often the case with Smith’s batting, the standout feature has been the placement. The run towards his second century showed how he can work the field at will. A slower ball from Jasprit Bumrah was driven through backward point. In the next delivery, the most delicate of late cuts beat short third man. The final ball of the over was taken from around fourth stump to fine leg.Facing Yuzvendra Chahal in the next over, there was a brace of scampered twos with perfectly paced shots either side of a straight six. The ball after reaching his hundred he played the most astonishing stroke of the innings, stepping right across outside off and scooping Hardik Pandya over fine leg, while ending up rolling in the crease. Next ball, Smith toe-ended a wide delivery to short third man. Despite everything he had done, he was still furious with himself.Scores of 350-plus won’t be needed all the time, but on flat pitches like this, a team needs the ability to do it. Smith’s displays have been part of two hugely convincing Australia batting performances – this was their third-highest total, and Friday’s is also in the top 10. A longer run of matches, in a variety of conditions, and against some better bowling needs to be viewed before any significant conclusions are drawn, but there are signs that Australia’s one-day batting is undertaking the evolution it needed to remain with the leading pack.The ODI series in England last year was won by a brilliant stand of 212 between Glenn Maxwell and Alex Carey and now the top order has filled their boots in these two games. Warner, who limped off with a serious-looking groin injury early in India’s chase, and captain Finch form a formidable opening pair: this year alone they have four century stands (three in three matches at the SCG) and during this partnership of 142, they went past David Boon and Geoff Marsh into third in Australia’s all-time list. Adam Gilchrist and Mark Waugh are just over 200 runs ahead of them, then there is work to do to catch Gilchrist and Matthew Hayden.Glenn Maxwell switch-hits during his half-century•Getty ImagesThen you have the engine room of Smith and Labuschagne at No. 3 and 4. The latter is still evolving as a one-day cricketer, but his 70 off 61 balls in this match, while not as dynamic as Smith, ensured things did not stall. And if Smith is bringing a new gear to his ODI batting, it will take the pressure off Labuschagne.They are followed by a combination of allrounders, the central figure of which is Maxwell. His last five ODI innings have brought 294 runs at 73.50 and a strike-rate of 143.41 (and in this series it’s 108 runs off 48 balls). If Maxwell has found his home in the one-day side, so many of Australia’s plans will come together.Given the uncertainty over the cricket calendar in a post-Covid world, it is not yet entirely certain when Australia’s next ODIs will be after this tour. Currently, it is scheduled to be a short tour to West Indies in the middle of 2021, but the match in Canberra on Wednesday will be the last on home soil until next season. Can Smith make it a hat-trick of hundreds? You wouldn’t put it past him.

Sanju Samson and Rahul Chahar take Smart Stats honours

A look at the top individual performance so far in the IPL with the help of our statistical tools

ESPNcricinfo stats team20-Apr-2021At the end of the first three rounds of matches, here is a look at some of the highlights of the IPL 2021 season so far through the lens of Smart Stats, which looks at every batting and bowling performance through the prism of match context, thus going beyond the basic metrics of runs, wickets, strike rates and economy rates.ESPNcricinfo LtdMost impactful performance in a game
Sanju Samson’s outstanding 119 from 63 balls took pole position, followed by Shikhar Dhawan’s 92 off 49 against the Punjab Kings. Although Samson’s century came in a lost cause, it was by far the best individual performance. The next highest score for Rajasthan was just 25.The most impactful bowling performance was Rahul Chahar’s 4 for 27, which helped the Mumbai Indians beat the Kolkata Knight Riders while defending a low score of 152. Chahar got his first wicket when the Knight Riders needed 81 from 68 deliveries and then dismissed the other top three batters to set up the win. Chahar’s four wickets were worth 6.34 Smart Wickets. Jaydev Unadkat’s outstanding powerplay performance against the Delhi Capitals and Shahbaz Ahmed’s three wickets in an over against the Sunrisers Hyderabad were the next-best bowling performances. The 76 runs AB de Villiers scored against the Knight Riders was the third-best batting performance.ESPNcricinfo LtdNegative impact performances
Since smart runs take into account the conditions and match context, and gives the real value of each run scored, it is possible to find out – by checking the difference between smart runs and the actual runs scored – whether an innings was beneficial or detrimental to the team.For instance, KL Rahul’s 61 from 51 deliveries against the Capitals were worth just 44 smart runs, which suggests it harmed the Kings’ cause. That is because, while Mayank Agarwal, his opening partner, scored at a strike rate of 191.66, Rahul scored at just 119.60. In the end, the Kings managed to score 195 when they were looking at close to 220 at the halfway stage, and the Capitals chased down the score in just 18.2 overs. In a match where the average strike rate was 162.6, Rahul scored at 119.60.There were two other knocks that negatively influenced a team but there were other players who compensated for it to ensure the team did not lose. Devdutt Padikkal and Ishan Kishan had an impact of -12 runs but de Villiers and Kieron Pollard made up for the slow scores of their team-mates towards the end.At the other end, David Miller’s 62 and Jonny Bairstow’s 43 were the innings that had the highest positive influence, in terms of difference between the smart runs and the runs they scored. Miller’s 62 were worth 82 smart runs while Bairstow’s 43 were worth 63 smart runs.ESPNcricinfo LtdOvers that swung the game around
ESPN’s Forecaster tool is fed with match situations, team strengths, and historic information, based on which it comes up with probabilities of a team winning. As the game progresses, these probabilities change. Here is a look at some of the instances where the win probabilities changed dramatically in an over.In their chase of 153 against Mumbai, the Knight Riders were 134 for 5 in 18 overs, needing 19 runs from 12 balls with two of the best finishers at the crease – Dinesh Karthik and Andre Russell. Their win probability was 80.15% at that stage. However, the world’s best death bowler, Jasprit Bumrah, conceded just four runs in the 19th over to decrease the win probability by 50 percentage points to 30%. Mumbai went on to win the game by 10 runs.In the game against the Kings, the Royals needed 40 runs from 18 deliveries with five wickets in hand. They had only an 18% chance of winning at that stage. However, Samson and Rahul Tewatia smashed Jhye Richardson for 19 runs to increase the win probability to 75%. Although in the end this was not enough for the Royals to win, the over had a huge change in fortunes, which the Royals could not capitalise on.Ahmed’s three-wicket over against the Sunrisers had the third-highest change in win percentages. Before the 17th over, the Sunrisers had an 80% chance of winning, while after the over, it fell down to 37%, and the Royal Challengers Bangalore won by six runs.

Stats – Rishabh Pant's lone rescue act, Marco Jansen's dream debut series

India become the first side to lose 20 wickets in a Test match as a result of catches

Sampath Bandarupalli13-Jan-20221 Rishabh Pant’s century was the first for India in an all-out total under 200 in Test cricket. Twelve players before Pant have scored a Test hundred in an all-out innings of less than 200, but none while batting at No.6 or lower.58.82 Percentage of team runs contributed by Pant in the second innings. Only one batter made a higher contribution for India while batting at No. 6 or lower in a completed Test innings – 62.32% by Kapil Dev with his 129 against South Africa in 1992.

3 Number of wicketkeepers to score a Test hundred in all of England, Australia and South Africa – Adam Gilchrist, Jonny Bairstow and Pant. No Indian keeper before Pant had scored a Test century in any of these three countries.4 Number of hundreds for Pant in Test cricket. These are the second-most for an Indian wicketkeeper, behind MS Dhoni’s six centuries. Three of Pant’s four hundreds have come outside India – no other Indian keeper has more than one Test hundred away from home.19 Number of wickets for Marco Jansen in this series. Only four bowlers have taken more wickets in their debut Test series of three or fewer matches. Jansen’s 19 wickets are also the most in a Test series for South Africa since their re-admission in 1992.

20 Number of wickets lost by India as a result of catches in Cape Town, the first team to lose all 20 wickets to this kind of dismissal in a Test match. There have been five previous instances of a team losing 19 wickets as a result of catches in a Test match – the last of those by South Africa against England in 2020, also in Cape Town.55 Number of wickets lost by India as a result of catches in the series against South Africa, the most by a team in a three-match Test series. The previous highest for this kind of dismissal was 48 wickets by Pakistan against New Zealand in 2009.94.75 Keshav Maharaj’s bowling average in Test cricket against India. It is the worst average in Tests against India for any player to have bowled 1000-plus balls. Only seven players have a worse bowling average against an opponent in Tests (min: 1000 balls bowled).

Full proves foolish as Chris Woakes feels the new-ball strain

Guileless display from England quicks does little to change the Anderson-Broad narrative

Andrew Miller10-Mar-2022Chris Woakes belongs to a select band of cricketers to have bowled the first ball in a World Cup final. He knows what it’s like to have the eyes of the world boring into the back of his skull as he approaches his delivery stride and, when it comes to Test cricket, he even knows what it’s like to marshal an unlikely run-chase from five-down for spit. But he’s surely never felt pressure quite like his opening spell on the second day in Antigua.As Woakes trotted in with that familiar arrow-straight approach, buzzing his way through the crease with the neat, incisive lines of a sawblade in a timber-mill, he would have known that he was about to be judged like never before in his international career. And by the time he trooped from the field with the bruised figures of 12-2-54-1, he might have been entitled to wonder if he’d been set up to fail.An awful lot of platitudes have been trotted out by England’s management in the weeks since they chose to dispense with James Anderson and Stuart Broad and their 1,177-wickets-worth of Test-match knowhow. But nothing has jarred with the evidence of a nine-year international career quite like the suggestion – voiced with little conviction by England’s captain Joe Root – that a sustained run with the new ball was all that Woakes needed to transform his status from priceless team player to golden-armed attack leader.The true reasons for Anderson’s and Broad’s binnings may never be publicly aired – are they really too old, or are they simply being challenged to fight for their places in the summer? Are the shadows that they cast too immense for others to flourish (the charge that was levelled at the women’s captain Charlotte Edwards after her ruthless culling in 2016), or was Root’s complaint about the lengths that they bowled in England’s defeat in Adelaide the final proof that the captain and his star bowlers had reached a fork in the road?Whatever the truth, this void in England’s reasoning – and the inevitable speculation that it has caused – has been thoroughly and damagingly distracting. Even a throwback to that very 2021 chestnut, rest and rotation, would have been preferable to the death by innuendo that Woakes, and to a lesser extent Craig Overton, have endured in the series build-up. Woakes, after all, went more than 12 months – between August 2020 and September 2021 – without a single Test appearance despite being England’s reigning Test cricketer of the Year. If this chance to lead the line had been presented as a reward for long service during lockdown, there might have been a few raised eyebrows, but surely a lot more understanding.Instead, the reasoning has been so weird, even the player himself didn’t really seem to believe he warranted it, after his six wickets at 55.33 in the Ashes had exacerbated the gulf between his home and away Test stats – 94 wickets at 22.63 in English conditions, and 31 at 52.38 overseas. Instead, it’s as if the post-Ashes intention of the England management had been to rip the players out of their comfort zones, and expose them to the harshest sink-or-swim realities of top-level professional sport – and if that’s the case, then fair play, they nailed the brief.And so it came to that fateful new-ball spell – a Dukes ball, no less, Woakes’ weapon of choice in his frequent excursions on home soil. In he charged, with conviction and with the occasional pretty-looking zip past the outside edge. But, assuming Kraigg Brathwaite and John Campbell had kept even half an ear to the ground in the Ashes fall-out, there was never going to be any mystery about his methods.Full and fuller was the requirement, in a guilelessly gung-ho bid for hooping swing – a display, in fact, that served only to reinforce the wisdom of ages that England have chosen to dispense with on this tour. Anderson and Broad would never have put up with this nonsense, whanging an unresponsive ball into the blockhole time and again, to be drilled back down the ground at an initial rate of seven an over. They’d have dragged those lengths back – much as it seems they did, to Root’s chagrin, in Adelaide – and conceded their runs at one an over while priming their orb for that display of reverse-swing that did, briefly, look like transforming England’s fortunes in the afternoon session.”It’s obviously going to be talked about, Anderson and Broad, because they are legends but we just have to admit we didn’t get it right to start with, and we’ll be out to get it right next time,” Mark Wood said at the close of playCraig Overton veered away from a full length to bounce out John Campbell•Gareth Copley/Getty Images”I don’t think it’s about being patient, we set higher standards than just being patient,” he added. “We’re out here to win. We’re trying to get it right now but, as can happen with any bowler, we just didn’t get it right to start. We maybe tried a little bit too hard, with the void of Anderson and Broad we wanted to try hard and prove we could do it, maybe that was it. But the way we came back showed good character as a group.”According to Cricviz’s Expected Wickets model, England’s new-ball effort was their third-least threatening of the past decade, a display outdone only by England’s efforts at Melbourne and Sydney at the fag-end of the 2017-18 Ashes – the former on one of the most disgracefully dead drop-in pitches in history; the latter in an asphyxiatingly hot dead-rubber at the SCG, a match in which Root would later keel over with sun-stroke.England’s lack of penetration was exemplified by the 1.5 degrees of swing that their openers located – compared to the 2.5 degrees that West Indies had found in routing England for 48 for 4 on the first morning. You would not have believed that West Indies have been starved of runs in recent encounters as Brathwaite galloped to the fastest fifty of his career, and in the process added his team’s first half-century opening stand … since they faced the same opponents in the final Test of their 2018-19 series win. In case Root was unaware, these guys tend to raise their game when England are in town.England’s lack of situational awareness was at times staggering. On the one hand, Root has clearly learned to treasure the pace and penetration of his last remaining 90mph bowler, Wood, and not bowl him into the ground as he did with Jofra Archer in 2019-20. On the other hand, limiting Wood to three overs out of the first 23, while West Indies galumphed to 95 for 1 with close to a boundary an over was another baffling misallocation of his resources.Related

  • Chris Woakes keen for another crack but England without Ollie Robinson for first Test

  • Bonner, Holder stand firm in West Indies rebuild

  • Holder rues missed chances as West Indies target new ball

  • Simmons: Batters 'need to give bowlers something to work with'

When finally thrown the ball, Wood duly struck in the second over of his comeback spell, luring Brathwaite with the wide one after tucking him up with another off-the-peg display of sustained pace. That’s the sort of lack of guile that pays dividends on surfaces as slow as this, not the sort of optimistic lollipops that Woakes felt obliged to fling at his opponents, as he strained for that elusive swing. By the close, his over-exertions had sent ten deliveries – or nearly one an over – sliding down the leg side, as well as one rank full-toss outside off that Jermaine Blackwood flicked contemptuously for one of the ten fours in Woakes’ day’s work.At least Overton got the memo before it was too late. His own England credentials may be hanging by an even more slender thread than his new-ball partner’s, but at least having been driven for two fours in his third new-ball over, he swiftly dispensed with the pleasantries when called upon again, and bombed out Campbell with a bouncer just when he was threatening to put the hammer down.Overton later delivered a useful display of reverse swing as back-up to Wood and Ben Stokes – who was restored to being an actual bowler here, rather than that spurious bang-it-in enforcer who succumbed to a side strain in the Ashes. But as if emboldened by the start that they had been given, as well as the knowledge that all things must pass, Nkrumah Bonner and Jason Holder rode out the threat with broad-batted resistance to inch their side ever closer to parity by the close.”Of course it’s weird,” Wood admitted, when asked what it was like to take the field with neither Broad nor Anderson. “They have been there every time. We can’t compare ourselves to them, because we are not them. We have to bring what we can do. Unfortunately the best we can do wasn’t that first bit. The second bit was a lot better. We have to bring our best next time, so we are on it.”

Tom Moody on Sunrisers' dream fast-bowling line-up: 'You should be able to take wickets in all phases of the innings'

The Sunrisers Hyderabad head coach talks about Umran Malik, how the side ended up building an Indian bowling core, and more

Interview by Shashank Kishore05-May-2022After successive losses at the start of their IPL 2022 campaign, Sunrisers Hyderabad went on a five-match winning run. Unlike teams who have built their unit around batting, Sunrisers have a pedigreed bowling attack, largely Indian. Tom Moody, their head coach, who has been with the side for much of their journey in the IPL, explains what has gone into the making of their attack.Over the years, Sunrisers’ fast bowling core has largely been Indian. Has that been one of the big focus areas?
A lot of people have recognised over the years in T20 cricket that the 120 balls you defend are absolutely vital. I’ve always had the philosophy of making sure you should have the ability to take wickets in all three phases of your innings. With that in mind, ideally it’s nice to be able to secure Indian talent to fulfil those roles.Like for any specific role in the squad, you need to look at the supply and demand of what is available and make your judgement under pressure on auction day. So for us, having the familiarity of a couple of players we have brought back into the squad in 2022 was a no-brainer. Someone like Bhuvi [Bhuvneshwar Kumar], who has done so much over a long period of time in IPL and India, we believe he still has plenty of years to come with his specific skills, that is to be able to bowl what I’d call the bookends of the game. And then you’ve got Nattu [T Natarajan] who has grown and grown as a mature fast bowler, gotten better and better. Yes, he had a slight hiccup with injury, but he’s not the first fast bowler to go through that.Natarajan has developed as this on-demand yorker specialist. Was he always one?
We knew of him as the yorker specialist from Tamil Nadu, and he’d had his success in the T20 League [TNPL] down there. But in his initial couple of years with us at Sunrisers there was a significant gulf between [his performances] in domestic cricket and IPL, but to his credit he has worked extremely hard on his skills and the physical side of fast bowling. He has continued to refine and perfect those skills he clearly had at the beginning. He just had to sharpen them a little further to provide that consistency at the IPL level and internationally.Related

  • Ravi Shastri: 'Promise you, Umran Malik will be a handful in red-ball cricket'

  • In case you forgot: Bhuvneshwar Kumar is still one of the sharpest, most skilful bowlers in T20

  • Shami: Speed not everything, Umran needs to 'be accurate at high pace'

  • At 156.9 kph, Umran Malik records fastest ball of IPL 2022

  • Bhuvneshwar and Malik, the yin and yang of Sunrisers' attack

Some players can make the adjustment upwards and deliver their natural strength at the highest level; others find it difficult. Nattu has got better and better at refining his skill and remaining committed and authentic to who he is as a fast bowler. He hasn’t tried to do anything, but has got perfect at what he is really good at. In the T20 format, bowlers of his calibre are very rare.You’ve backed a number of Indian fast bowlers – Khaleel Ahmed, Basil Thampi, Sandeep Sharma, Bhuvneshwar, Natarajan, Umran Malik… the list is long. Tell us about your scouting process.
Scouting is important but what we do recognise, particularly now with Indian cricket is, nearly everyone knows what talent is out there, even though there is an overwhelming amount of talent. But it’s very rare that you can uncover a hidden gem. We were very fortunate to be able to do that with Umran Malik, but those examples are rare. We also managed to do that with Abdul Samad, who comes from the same state [Jammu and Kashmir]. We first gave Umran an opportunity through net bowling and the rest is history. The actual finding of players of that calibre are rare. Often young fast bowlers who have had any sort of recognition are pretty much on some sort of pathway, whether it’s through their state or through the Indian high-performance centre. Everyone has got the same advantage. It’s a question of identifying which one you feel can fit your strategy and set-up.Moody says T Natarajan is among those players who are able to make adjustments upwards to deliver their natural skills at the highest level•BCCIIt’s one thing to see players, another to back them, isn’t it?
A lot of people have commented over the years on how we have tended to bank [on] a lot of Indian fast bowlers. I don’t think we have gone out there with a conscious approach to have a squad full of Indian fast bowlers. What we have done is, we’ve gone out there with a conscious effort to make sure we have those specific roles nailed down within our squad. We have not only guys like Bhuvi as a leader of the pack with the new ball, we’ve got someone who can come in if Bhuvi is injured for a game or two or whatever it might be. And our focus has leaned toward Indian pace.It’s also because when Sunrisers Hyderabad took over from the Deccan Chargers in 2013, we didn’t inherit a lot of Indian international batsmen. They [Chargers] had Rohit [Sharma], but he got transferred to Mumbai Indians [in 2011], so we lost a world-class batter there. We managed to retain Shikhar Dhawan, but basically we had an inexperienced batting unit. So we had to build our batting around international players because there were very few Indians in the market to fill that role.Talking specifically about Umran Malik, it must delight you to see the wicketkeeper and slip fielders standing at the 30-yard ring when he bowls?
Look, it’s not just me. He’s thrilling the cricketing world with his appetite for pace and natural flair. There’s nothing better than seeing someone turn up and bowl 150 clicks, unless you’re at the other end.Umran has been terrific. We know his journey has just begun and he will have his challenges, like any other cricketer. Whether that be continuing to evolve and develop as a fast bowler or other challenges, he’s got a strong unit around him at Sunrisers. He’s got a great mentor in Dale Steyn. He’s a very focused and hard-working kid, so there’s a lot of upsides for him with Sunrisers and for Indian cricket.A lot of Indian fast bowlers in the past have gone from express to line and length because of injuries.

I don’t think he’ll ever be a line-and-length bowler. He’s born in a Ferrari and he’s going to drive the Ferrari (). He, like any fast bowler, will have his challenges, with injuries or whatever else, but the knowledge around managing fast bowlers and managing their aggression as they develop in their early years is a lot better now, so it’s a case of making sure he’s getting the right guidance, the right mentoring, and that he’s surrounded by key people who don’t overcomplicate the process. Given he’s a part of the Sunrisers family, that’s something I and the likes of Dale Steyn will make sure we communicate constantly throughout the year with the key people – with him, at the state level, and also at the high-performance level, to make sure that we’re all on the same page, looking after a rare diamond.Might Marco Jansen be a genuine allrounder for SRH in the future?•BCCIHave you seen a marked difference in the bowler who left the IPL last year and the one who arrived for this season?
I’ve seen improvements just in the games he has played this year. He was getting a little bit of negative feedback with regards to how expensive he was. His economy was quite high in the earlier games, but I think people have got to understand that when you have speed in the short format, you’re naturally going to have a high price. You need to accept there’s going to be a high economy, but what you want is a positive wicket return. He is encouraged not so much to focus on the runs he’s going for but his attacking approach and how he’s looking to pick wickets. And we support him with that by giving him some tactical inputs and game sense around his approach, depending on where we’re playing and who we’re playing. He is forever evolving, improving and understanding the game, because he’s still very young and has a lot to learn. What kind of a person is he?
He’s pretty relaxed, hard-working. He’s a character, has a bright personality and is a popular member of the squad, so a lot of people naturally gravitate towards him. Over the last 12 months, his English has got better and better, and our communication has become lot more fluent. His English has got a lot better than my Hindi over the last 12 months. He’s a very likeable character. The one thing that impressed us even before he became a contracted IPL player is that even when he was a net bowler, he was eager to learn, he’d ask a lot of questions. If he had to use Abdul Samad as a translator, he wouldn’t be shy to do that. He was always eager to learn, about his action, run-up, what he needs to be doing in the gym with regards to his strength programme, his rehab, etc. He’s been very proactive in that regard, which is a great sign for a young cricketer – for him to naturally gravitate to that approach as against having to be encouraged to go down that path.Let’s talk about Marco Jansen, another fast bowler in your ranks.
He’s unique. When you’re 6’9″ and bowling left-arm and with the ability to swing the ball, there are a few things going for you. One thing we really liked about Marco was, his style brought a point of difference to the IPL. A lot of players are not used to that extra bounce someone of that height can generate, so it gives our attack a point of difference when you’ve got someone delivering from that height who can get steep bounce and movement. The other thing is, we have a lot of hopes on Marco with regards to his batting ability. We haven’t seen it in the IPL yet, but in the mid- to long-term, we see him as a genuine allrounder, someone who can fill a role for us in the top six or seven and have a great impact with the ball as well.Halfway into the season, how satisfied have you been with the bowling recalibration, especially since you don’t have the bankability of Rashid Khan?
Rashid is a unique bowler. Any team that secures his services is going to have a huge value with the 24 balls that he delivers. But for whatever the circumstances were with regards to the auction and retention, unfortunately we couldn’t continue that story. But we have got a different approach this year. We have had to rethink our strategy.With the retention of Umran we knew he was going to play a role for us in the middle overs. We’re addressing the middle overs slightly differently now, and Umran is the aggressor in that role. Generally there the wristspinners – [Yuzvendra] Chahal or Rashid, or whoever it might be – are the aggressors in a different way. We have a different approach. We’ve had to work around with our balance. Washington Sundar, who has missed a few games because of injury, plays an important role. He is someone who can bat and play a key role as spinner in powerplay overs or outside them, depending on the match-ups. We find the balance working for us but one of the most important parts about our success over the last few games is our impact as a unit in the powerplay, and also the way we’ve controlled and shut down the back end of the innings.

Throwback Thursday provides thrilling peek into Hardik 2.0

His blockbuster all-round show in Southampton is a reminder of what Indian fans had been missing out on

Shashank Kishore08-Jul-2022Hardik Pandya’s injuries – especially a stress fracture that needed surgery and extensive rehabilitation for the better part of two years, between 2018 and 2020 – led to several question marks over his longevity in the game.Can he be the Hardik of old? Can he remain injury free? Can he bowl? If yes, can he rediscover his pace and subtle skills that brought him success?Then at the start of IPL 2022, you wondered how he would warm up to the pressures of captaincy. Early in the season, you wondered if he was putting himself under too much pressure by trying to be Gujarat Titans’ everything man in the batting department. He batted at three, then four, finished off innings, held an end up – essentially, he was the jack of all trades.Related

  • Kohli's form, Iyer vs Suryakumar, and Pandya's ODI return on India's discussion table

  • Attacking mantra, Bhuvneshwar's form and Suryakumar's consistency bode well for India

  • Problem of plenty: How do India fit Virat Kohli in their T20I XI?

  • Hardik Pandya shines with bat and ball as India go 1-0 up

  • Kohli must hit the right gears to stay in the gauntlet match

On Friday, Hardik delivered a blockbuster performance in what was perhaps India’s sternest T20I test since that World Cup exit last year. Against an England side that has set the benchmark as far as white-ball cricket goes, Hardik scored his maiden T20I half-century and picked up four wickets, a double no other Indian has achieved, to power India to an emphatic series lead.”I’m enjoying my cricket right now and that is more important,” he said after his match-winning performance in Southampton. “A lot of time goes behind the scenes with my preparation to ensure my body is all right. Because I took a long break [last year], I wanted to make sure my rhythm was all right, and it is.”That was a conscious decision taken by myself, when I decided that I wanted some time off from the game. When I can’t enjoy the game, there’s no point of Hardik Pandya playing. For me, it was about the effort and the intensity. When I got that, it felt very satisfying.”Hardik is in a great space currently. His career has scaled new heights. He has captained Titans to IPL glory, realised a boyhood dream of captaining India, and is – in his own words – “enjoying the present without worrying about how much I will play or contribute to the future”.These are words of a man who is confident in the skills he possesses. Skills India have dearly missed, and skills that have lent India the flexibility to play six bowlers, something they missed during the T20 World Cup campaign in the UAE, which ended in a group-stage exit.

“What I will play and what I won’t play, only time will tell. The focus right now is wherever I can give 100%, I want to. If I can’t give 100%, I will not take someone’s place”Hardik Pandya

At Mumbai Indians, Hardik’s role was to maximise the few balls he got towards the end of the innings. His batting positions at Titans brought with them many questions. And he proved he could temper his game to play situations before teeing off.
As a leader, you saw him soak in pressure for the youngsters to play freely in the IPL, a philosophy straight out of MS Dhoni’s captaincy book. All this stems from a great sense of enjoyment an injury-free Hardik has derived from his game.His performances have suddenly elicited talks – from the outside, of course – of his potential return to red-ball cricket. Hardik, however, firmly brushed aside such a prospect, for now.”It depends on what we’re playing. Right now, it’s the white-ball season, and the World Cup is coming, so we’re more focused there,” he said. “How much white-ball cricket I play for India, that much better. When Tests come, let’s see. But what I will play and what I won’t play, only time will tell. The focus right now is wherever I can give 100%, I want to. If I can’t give 100%, I will not take someone’s place.”On Thursday, he came into bat with India at 89 for 3 in the ninth over. He started briskly; his first scoring shot was a flat-batted rocket past legspinner Matt Parkinson. When he lost Suryakumar Yadav in the 14th, he had to ride a brief slowdown because India hadn’t got to Dinesh Karthik’s ideal entry point yet.”Right now it’s the white-ball season, and the World Cup is coming, so we’re more focused there.”•PA Photos/Getty ImagesHardik recalibrated without affecting momentum. He brought up the half-century off just 30 balls and by the time he was out in the 18th, India were staring at 200. Hardik’s, and India’s, approach was reminiscent of England’s mantra that has brought them much success.”Credit to Rahul Dravid and the management where those people allow us to express ourselves,” he said. “When you have so much clarity from coaches and management, as an individual, you get a big boost. If you play a shot and get out, you don’t feel ‘oh I’ve played a poor shot’. Credit to coach, which is important as a player.”With the ball, Hardik pegged England back in the powerplay with the wickets of David Malan and Liam Livingstone in one over. The first ball of his second over brought the wicket of Jason Roy, who was out slashing to deep third. At 33 for 4, England were on the ropes.All the elements of Hardik the bowler were on display. He was brisk, he was hitting hard lengths – a sign that he was bending his back – and there were subtle changes in pace, and he mixed them up with his usual smarts. In short, he seemed a complete package.In February, when Hardik wasn’t picked for the West Indies series, chairman of selectors Chetan Sharma, in a rare press conference, touched upon how he’d return only if he was “100% match fit”. Through the IPL and his performances over the past month, Hardik has done everything in his capacity to prove his fitness, and in the process deliver telling contributions.

Is Green too good not to pick and who misses out for David?

Australia now have a major squeeze for batting spots, but the death bowling was put under pressure by India

Alex Malcolm26-Sep-20222:48

Hodge: Green might go on to become one of the best Australia has produced

Green’s opening salvo a long-term bonus and a short-term shadowThere was optimism and quiet confidence within Australia’s camp that Cameron Green would become a fine T20 player in time but no one quite expected him to show it so soon with so little experience behind him. Having never opened in any professional match and having only played 14 professional T20s and one T20I coming into the series, Green was asked to open on a hunch from Australia’s selectors and he delivered with two stunning half-centuries at a mind-blowing strike-rate of 214.54.It was hunch that had been discussed previously by Australia and Perth Scorchers. “It’s probably opportunistic, the way that he’s coming in with the opening position with obviously Davey Warner not being here and a couple of other players in our World Cup 15,” Australia coach Andrew McDonald said after the final T20I in Hyderabad. “Fortuitous, but he’s taken that opportunity. We thought he had the skill when we did our strategy before we come over here. And he’s taken on some of the best bowlers in world cricket. You could argue Jasprit [Bumrah] is one of the best T20 bowlers ever. So to be able to do that, work your way through that situation again tonight, and do it two out of three times is very impressive and bodes well.”But as of now, Green is not part of Australia’s 15-player World Cup squad. He is scheduled to be appearing in the Sheffield Shield for Western Australia when Australia’s T20 squad reconvenes in Queensland next week for matches against West Indies. After what he did against India, Australia’s selectors might be secretly praying for an injury to one of their batters so they can somehow get him in. But even then, there is no place for him at the top of the order with Warner returning and captain Aaron Finch’s place secure. Green will cast a large shadow over the team should he not end up in the squad.Related

  • Green retained for West Indies T20Is as Australia take cautious approach ahead of World Cup

  • 'I won't just sit out' – Suryakumar overcomes illness to give India series win

  • Cameron Green now makes a mark in T20Is after being 'thrown into the deep end'

  • Kohli, Suryakumar, Axar star as India seal T20I series 2-1

  • Skill, power, wristwork and invention: India thrive on the Kohli-Suryakumar show

David delivers as expectedTim David had previously cast a large shadow over Australia’s T20 team before finally getting his opportunity in this series and he duly delivered on what was expected of him. A calm 18 off 14 in game one to help Matthew Wade guide Australia home was followed by a sensational 54 off 27 in game three to lift Australia from a perilous position at 117 for 6 to a near match-winning total.Australia’s selectors were keen to see how David fitted into an established middle-order, albeit in the absence of Marcus Stoinis. His partnerships with Wade, who had an exceptional series, and Daniel Sams showcased his ability to work through the gears alongside both senior and junior partners, playing different roles when the situation required. It would seem ridiculous to consider leaving him out of Australia’s first-choice World Cup XI now. But the question is, who misses out?Tim David quickly looked at ease in Australian colours•BCCISmith still vulnerableWarner, Mitchell Marsh and Stoinis are seemingly locks to return for the upcoming series against West Indies and England which leads into the World Cup – providing the latter two are fit. Green can’t even get into the 15 and Australia must find room for David in the best XI. Steven Smith’s place was vulnerable heading to India and he was given the chance to bat at No. 3 in Marsh’s absence. He played nicely in Mohali to make 35 off 24 but his strike-rate of 145.83 in that innings was short of the 177.54 that was produced collectively by both teams in a high-scoring run-feast.Australia’s view of his power-hitting ability was evident in the eight-over-a-side sprint in Nagpur when he was dropped down the order to No. 6. He then scored at less than a run a ball in Hyderabad despite facing 10 balls in an innings where he was also dropped at backward point. If Smith is to play in the World Cup it could come at the expense of David, while Green will be playing Shield cricket. It would be an extraordinary show of faith from Australia’s selectors to make that call.There were some interesting calls over those who bowled the late overs•BCCIDeath bowling questionsBoth Australia and India struggled with the ball at the death in this series although McDonald acknowledged it was a very tough series for the bowlers in general. “There was really no place to hide for bowlers and particularly at the death coming up against Hardik [Pandya],” he said. “But I think we worked our way through some plans. We saw some good results with some of the plans that we implemented that may be able to transition to the World Cup.”The connection between here and Australia might slightly differ with a little bit more bounce, so some different tactics. Mitchell Starc clearly comes back into the picture, he’s been one of our best death bowlers, so we feel like we’ll get reinforcements there. But I think most death bowling attacks are under the pump with the high skills of the batters these days. Are we keen to get better at death bowling? The answer to that is yes. But we just encourage our guys to make good decisions, execute, and see what happens.”While’s Starc’s return does alleviate some issues, the fact that Green, Sams and Nathan Ellis were asked to bowl in the final two overs of each match more often than Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins, when none of them are in the World Cup 15 does raise more questions than answers to McDonald’s death bowling conundrum. Australia’s other potential option in the World Cup squad, Kane Richardson, did not play a single game in the series due to a side injury that he suffered in the warm-up in game one.

Were the pitches tougher to bat on in the 2023 India-Australia series or the 2017 one? Here's what the data says

Looking at pitching lines and lengths for offspinners against right-hand batters tells a story

Kartikeya Date13-Apr-2023Australia toured India for four Tests each in 2017 and 2023 and lost 1-2 both times. On its website, the BCCI publishes scorecards and ball-tracking records for each ball of these series (and others). Readers can look up any ball in a recent Test, ODI, T20I or IPL match played in India, one at a time.Related

  • Why you can't counter good spin bowling by just sweeping

  • This is the way: Going around the wicket to take buckets of wickets

  • Is the ICC's pitch-rating system fit for purpose?

These records make available the pitching point (line and length of the delivery), interception point (the point at which the ball hit the bat, pad or a part of the batter’s body, if at all), and the beehive point (the point at which the ball would have crossed, or did cross, the plane of the stumps). Additionally, the ball-tracking record provides measures of turn, seam movement and speed, among others. This is a treasure trove of information made available by the BCCI.ESPNcricinfo records a control measurement for each delivery. This is an answer (either yes or no) to the question “Did the ball end up where the batter intended?” This article uses these two types of records – ball-tracking and control – to describe the contest between offspinners and right-hand batters in the 2017 and 2023 series.Kartikeya DatePitch maps showing the pitching points and interception points for balls bowled by offspinners to right-hand batters in the two series are in the graphs above and below.Kartikeya DateFirst impressions suggest that the line of attack was straighter in 2023, mostly because the offspinners bowled around the wicket to right-handers most of the time. These distinctions are also shown in the table below. (This table includes all deliveries by offspinners to right-hand batters in these two series for which complete ball-tracking records (pitching, interception, beehive) are available. Records are not complete for 103 balls in the 2017 series and 36 balls in the 2023 series; 15 false shots and one dismissal in 2017 and six false shots and 0 dismissals in 2023 are consequently missed in this record.)

The effect of the change from over-the-wicket (predominant in 2017) to round the wicket (predominant in 2023) is evident most clearly in comparing balls of type B (not hitting the stumps, intercepted in line), and balls of type C (hitting the stumps, intercepted outside the line). While the frequency of false shots against type B was nearly double that of type C in both series, the conversion of false shots to dismissals was reversed. In 2017, getting outside the line meant safety for the right-hander against the offspinner. In 2023, it didn’t.The eight pitches did not offer assistance to the spinners and seamers equally. The characteristics of each pitch, as rendered by the control figures, are in the tables below. Pitches offered different degrees of turn, bounce, and variability in bounce.

The pitch in Indore was the most difficult of those in the two series because it offered generally low bounce that was highly uneven. By comparison, the Bengaluru pitch from 2017 also offered significant variable bounce to the fingerspinners, but the ball generally bounced more there. The Bengaluru pitch was probably not easier to bat on compared to the Indore one, but it was easier for the spinner to threaten the stumps in Indore. Nathan Lyon’s eight-wicket haul in the first innings in Bengaluru included six caught dismissals. His eight-wicket haul in Indore included six bowled or leg-before-wicket dismissals.

The tables suggest that five – Pune, Bangalore, Nagpur, Indore and Delhi – of the eight pitches could be considered spin-friendly and the other three might be considered less so, with reliable bounce and moderate turn. Batters managed a false shot once every 5.7 balls or better against fingerspin in these three Tests.Kartikeya DateThe graphs above and below show the interception points for right-hand batters facing offspinners in the 2017 and 2023 Border Gavaskar Trophy Tests. The one above shows the distribution of false shot rates according to interception points in Dharamsala, Ranchi and Ahmedabad. The second graph below shows the same for Pune, Bangalore, Nagpur, Delhi and Indore. The batting crease in the graphs is at 1.2m and the stumps are at 0.0m.Kartikeya DateFor the most part, batters try to play forward (they meet the ball at at least 2.3m from the stumps), or back. These are also the interception points at which the batter is most assured.On the flat pitches, as long as the batter read the length against the offspinner and got forward or back, the jeopardy was minimal (false shots occur at a rate of between one in 20 balls and one in ten balls). But when the batter was beaten in the flight, the jeopardy increased (false shots occur at a rate of between one in seven balls and one in four balls). This is probably what players are describing when they say that they can “trust the pitch”; the spinner has to beat the bat in the air in these cases.On the turning pitches, batters were beaten not just in the air but also off the pitch. So even when the batter met the ball with a full forward stroke, or playing well back, the jeopardy hovered above a rate of one false shot every eight balls (about 12%), and climbed to one every three balls or so when the batter was beaten in the air as well. Batting becomes significantly more difficult on pitches of this sort.At this point, it is worth wondering whether a batter’s judgement of length is affected by the behaviour of the pitch. In other words, does the fact that the batter cannot trust the pitch affect judgement of length?Distribution of lengths of deliveries by off spinners to right hand batters on the three flat pitches.•Kartikeya DateThe graphs above and below show the range of lengths by interception points on the turners and the flat pitches in the India-Australia series. Consider that all the deliveries from an offspinner that the right-hand batter intercepts at a distance of two metres from the stumps are arranged from the fullest to the shortest delivery. This range of lengths is described in the graphs using three values – the median length, the length of the delivery at the 10th percentile in the list, and the length of the delivery in the 90th percentile in the list. For instance, for interception point 0.8 in the graphic above, 50% of the balls were around five metres or fuller, 10% were 4.3m or fuller, and 90% were 7.4m or fuller.Distribution of lengths of deliveries by off spinners to right hand batters on the five turning pitches.•Kartikeya DateAs readers will probably expect, the range of lengths to which the batter plays well forward or back is narrower than the range of lengths for which the batter is caught in between. But there is no discernible difference in the distribution of lengths to which batters play forward or back based on the amount of assistance offered by the pitch. The record does not support the idea that a turning pitch disrupts the batter’s judgment of length. It does make pretty much all lengths more difficult to play. If anything, there is some evidence going the other way – that batters are able to, and do, take more liberties with the length on flatter pitches compared to turners.By bowling around the wicket, offspinners in the 2023 series were able to overpitch less often – their average length was 4.84m, 8.2 inches shorter than in 2017. They were also able to attack the stumps more, and give the right-hand batter fewer scoring opportunities through the off side compared to 2017. On the whole, judging by the false-shot frequency, the pitches in 2017 were probably marginally more difficult to bat on than the pitches in 2023. But in 2023, both sides had deeper spin attacks than in 2017, and both sides fielded five bowlers when they could (Australia did as soon as Cameron Green became available). Consequently, the scores were lower.As illustrated in this article through a discussion of offspin bowling against right-hand batters, the ball-by-ball record, combined with control, provides a picture of the contest between bat and ball that is not available from the traditional scorecard. The scorecard directs our attention to dismissals. Consequently a lot of analysis and discussion in cricket is focused on deliveries which result in dismissals. Largely these deliveries just happen to be ones on which dismissals occur; they could just as likely have occurred on several other deliveries. A genuinely comparative picture of the two contesting teams in a cricket match would consider which team threatened dismissal more persistently than the other in the field. This type of discussion is only possible with data.International teams already use a far more elaborate record of each delivery while preparing for matches, and often with live data feeds during matches. Some basic portion of this data should be published by cricket boards in the public domain. It will be welcomed by fans, and it will enable a textured reading of the skilled labour of batting and bowling rather than the headline outcomes provided in traditional scorecards.The interception distance from the stumps has been calculated by Himanish Ganjoo. I’m grateful for his help

Game
Register
Service
Bonus